The centennial of the Tibeto-Mongol treaty, 1913 - 2013
In: Lungta 17
Collection of articles on the 1913 Tibeto-Mongol Treaty, including the Tibetan and Mongolian versions of the treaty, and their respective translations into English
9 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Lungta 17
Collection of articles on the 1913 Tibeto-Mongol Treaty, including the Tibetan and Mongolian versions of the treaty, and their respective translations into English
The lives of Pho-lha-nas and Khang-chen-nas are well known, most importantly from Luciano Petech's seminal study of early 18th-century Tibet. Since the publication of that study, the appearance of several previously inaccessible sources has allowed us to form a fuller image of the situation in Tibet before and during their lifetimes, a period that coincided with the last era of Mongol dominion in Tibet. The effects of this domination and the concomitant integration of Tibetans and Mongols in military, political and other spheres of Tibetan life were observable decades after the end of Pho-lha-nas's rule. As a result, while the Dga'-ldan pho-brang government of the Dalai Lamas is a useful lens through which to view Tibet's history at this time, it is equally useful to construct a view of Tibet as simultaneously a Mongol realm, a "Qanate of Tibet."
BASE
In: Journal of the economic and social history of the Orient: Journal d'histoire économique et sociale de l'orient, Band 54, Heft 2, S. 307-309
ISSN: 1568-5209
In: China perspectives, Band 2009, Heft 3
ISSN: 1996-4617
In: Jane's Intelligence review: the magazine of IHS Jane's Military and Security Assessments Intelligence centre, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 54-55
ISSN: 1350-6226
World Affairs Online
In: China perspectives: Shenzhou-zhanwang, Heft 3, S. 25-37
ISSN: 2070-3449, 1011-2006
In: Monde chinois: nouvelle Asie ; revue trimestrielle, Band 31, Heft 3, S. 27-32
In: Perspectives chinoises: Shenzhou-zhanwang, Band 108, Heft 3, S. 27-40
ISSN: 1021-9013
Cet article analyse la façon dont l'histoire du Tibet et ses relations avec la Chine ont été interprétées et décrites en Chine depuis 1950. La Chine a longtemps prétendu que le Tibet lui avait été rattaché au XIIIe siècle, sous la dynastie des Yuan, mais de nombreux éléments démontrent que cette interprétation est une construction du XXe siècle. Une position chinoise plus dure affirme que la Chine historique correspond au territoire de la dynastie des Qing à son apogée, et que tout ce qui se trouve à l'intérieur de ces frontières a toujours fait partie de la Chine depuis les temps anciens, bien avant la période Yuan, et même avant les débuts connus de l'histoire.